Keserentakan Pemilu 2024 yang Paling Ideal Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

  • Mushaddiq Amir Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia

Abstract

The holding of concurrent elections on April 17 2019 is a new history in the general election process in Indonesia. This is the implication of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 14 /PUU/2013 on the review of Law Number 42 of 2008 concerning the Election of President and Vice President. Although simultaneous elections have been considered better than previous elections, it does not mean that there are no shortcomings in the implementation. The most appalling problem is the large number of fatalities by the election organizers who are seen as the impact of the 2019 concurrent elections as well as other technical problems. Looking at various aspects raised from the 2019 elections, the Association for Elections and Democracy (Perludem) conducted a review of the material of the Law on the 1945 Constitution to the Constitutional Court as outlined in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 55/PUU-XVII/2019. In their argument, the petitioner conveys a number of things related to the analysis that has been carried out in the holding of simultaneous elections held in 2019 yesterday. In the results of the decision, the Constitutional Court rejected the petition of the petitioner in its entirety because it was considered to be groundless. However, the Constitutional Court provides choices regarding election models that can be chosen and considered constitutional based on the 1945 Constitution.

Keyword: Concurrent elections , election model, election of 2024

References

Azed, A. B., & Amir, M. (2006). Pemilu dan partai politik di Indonesia. Pusat Studi Hukum Tata Negara, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Indonesia.

Mahmud Marzuki, P. (2005). Penelitian hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media.

Huda, N. (2017). Penataan Demokrasi dan Pemilu di Indonesia. Kencana.

Pahlevi, I. (2015). Pemilu serentak dalam sistem pemerintahan Indonesia. P3DI Setjen DPR RI dan Azza Grafika.

Haris, S. (2016). Pemilu nasional serentak 2019. Pustaka Pelajar berkerja sama dengan Electoral Research Institute (ERI), Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (LIPI).

Hanta Yuda A. R. (2010). Presidensialisme setengah hati: dari dilema ke kompromi. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Jurnal Ilmiah

Ahmadi, A. (2015). Analisis Konstruksi Hukum Konstitusionalitas Pemilu Serentak Pada Tahun 2019. Al-'Adl, 8(1), 1-19,

Ansori, L. (2017). Telaah Terhadap Presidential Threshold Dalam Pemilu Serentak 2019. Jurnal Yuridis, 4(1), 15-27.

Efriza, E. (2019). Penguatan Sistem Presidensial Dalam Pemilu Serentak 2019. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 16(1), 1-15.

Gai, A., & Tokan, F. B. (2020). Analisa Dampak Penyelenggaraan Pemilu Serentak Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Demokrasi Di Indonesia: Studi Kasus Penyelenggraan Pemilu di Kota Kupang-Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur Tahun 2019. Warta Governare: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 1(1), 109-128.

Hayat, H. (2016). Korelasi Pemilu Serentak dengan Multi Partai Sederhana Sebagai Penguatan Sistem Presidensial. Jurnal Konstitusi, 11(3), 468-491.

Junaidi, V. (2009). Menata Sistem Penegakan Hukum Pemilu Demokratis Tinjauan Kewenangan MK atas Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hasil Pemilu. Jurnal Konstitusi, 6(3), 103-143.

Kamil, A. B. (2017). Relevansi Pemilihan Umum Serentak Presiden Dengan Legislatif Terhadap Penguatan Sistem Presidensial di Indonesia. STAATSRECHT: Indonesian Constitutional Law Journal, 1(2).

Nuhrawati, A. (2018). Hukum Dan Demokrasi Jalan Menuju Kesejahteraan Rakyat. Pleno Jure, 7(2), 16-27.

Mainwaring, S. (1990). Presidentialism, multiparty systems, and democracy: the difficult equation (No. 144). Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies, University of Notre Dame.

Mamonto, M. A. W. W. (2019). Legal Politics of Simplifying Political Parties in Indonesia (Case Study of 2004–2014 Election). Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 2(1), 1-20.

Prasetyoningsih, N. (2014). Dampak Pemilihan Umum serentak bagi pembangunan demokrasi Indonesia. Media Hukum, 21(2), 23.

Stoll, H. (2015). Presidential coattails: A closer look. Party Politics, 21(3), 417-427.

Triono, T. R. I. O. N. O. (2017). Menakar efektivitas Pemilu serentak 2019. Jurnal Wacana Politik, 2(2), 156-164.

Media Online

Jane Aileen, Pemilu Serentak Di Tahun 2019, Kenapa Tidak Tahun Ini?, https://www.bantuanhukum.or.id/web/pemilu-serentak-di-tahun-2019-kenapa-tidak-tahun-ini/, diakses pada tanggal 18 April 2020.

Fitri Chusna Farisa, KPU Sebut Partisipasi Pemilih pada Pemilu 2019 Capai 81 Persen, https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2019/05/27/16415251/kpu-sebut-partisipasi-pemilih-pada-pemilu-2019-capai-81-persen, diakses 12 Juli 2020.

Andri Saubani, Denny JA Soroti Dampak Negatif Pilpres dan Pileg Serentak, https://www.republika.co.id/berita/nasional/politik/19/04/18/pq5t85409-denny-ja-soroti-dampak-negatif-pilpres-dan-pileg-serentak, diakses pada tanggal 5 Juni 2020.

Kode Inisiatif, Evaluasi Satu Tahun Penyelenggaraan Pemilu (KPU dan BAWASLU) Periode 2017-2022, http://perludem.org/2018/05/16/hasil-evaluasi-satu-tahun-kpu-dan-bawaslu-periode-2017-2021/, diakses 19 September 2020.

Sania Mashabi, Refleksi Pemilu 2019, Sebanyak 894 Petugas KPPS Meninggal Dunia, https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2020/01/22/15460191/refleksi-pemilu-2019-sebanyak-894-petugas-kpps-meninggal-dunia, dikases 9 Juni 2020.

https://www. researchgate.net/publication/258130109_The_Presidentialism_ Multipartism_and_ Democracy The_Difficult Combination, diakses pada 7 Oktober 2020.

Published
2020-10-20
Section
Articles