<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.2 20190208//EN"
                  "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.2" article-type="other">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id></journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
</journal-title-group>
<issn></issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<permissions>
</permissions>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="introduction">
  <title>Introduction</title>
  <p>The importance of land for human life is because human life cannot
  be separated from land. Land use must be adjusted to the conditions
  and nature of its rights, so that it provides benefits for the welfare
  and happiness of those who own it as well as for society and the
  state. [1] It is undeniable that land is a valuable commodity in human
  life. Land is not only a place to live, but also a place where human
  culture can develop and continue from generation to generation, that
  is how important land is for society.</p>
  <p>Land has an important role in the formation of humans since ancient
  times, land in society has its own attraction and is related to power.
  Land is not only seen as a place to sustain life, but also has social,
  political and cultural functions. [2]</p>
  <p>Based on the provisions of the 1945 Constitution, the Basic
  Agrarian Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Regulations
  was drafted. The enactment of Law No. 5 of 1960 concerning Basic
  Agrarian Regulations (hereinafter referred to as UUPA) which came into
  effect on September 24, 1960 has brought about fundamental changes in
  agrarian law in Indonesia, especially in land law. with a set of
  regulations regarding land, aimed at ensuring legal certainty for land
  rights throughout the territory of the Unitary State of the Republic
  of Indonesia can be realized. [3] The enactment of UUPA is a
  breakthrough in guaranteeing justice and legal certainty, order, and
  the welfare of the people of the Unitary State of the Republic of
  Indonesia related to applicable land regulations, including land
  disputes.</p>
  <p>Customary land that is not legally recognized is often a source of
  conflict due to the absence of a legitimate legal review, therefore
  the importance of regulation, namely, clear regulatory protection of
  rights can help protect the rights of the community, especially
  indigenous communities, land registration, a good legal land
  registration system can reduce land disputes by providing evidence of
  legitimate ownership, as well as the existence of a legal review so
  that it can be recognized as legitimate land ownership. [4]</p>
  <p>Papua provincial regulation number 5 of 2022 concerning the
  recognition and protection of indigenous legal communities in Papua
  province. Considering in letter (a) that the recognition, respect and
  protection and development of the rights of indigenous legal
  communities in Papua province have been regulated by Law number 21 of
  2001 concerning special autonomy for Papua province. Letter (b)
  explains that in order to make the recognition and protection of
  indigenous peoples in Papua province effective, it is necessary to
  regulate the recognition and protection of indigenous legal
  communities. And letter (c) emphasizes that based on the
  considerations as referred to in letters (a) and (b) it is necessary
  to form a Papua provincial regulation concerning the recognition and
  protection of indigenous legal communities in Papua province.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="method">
  <title>Method</title>
  <p>The type of research used in this study is qualitative research.
  [5] Descriptive qualitative research means that the data obtained will
  be collected and manifested directly in the form of a description or
  picture of the atmosphere or condition of the object as a whole and as
  it is in the form of spoken or written words from people or observed
  behavior. Descriptive qualitative research is a research procedure
  that produces data in the form of written words which are a
  description of something. These data are obtained through field
  observation activities and interviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="discussion">
  <title>Discussion</title>
  <p>Mamberamo Raya Regency is one of the regencies located in Papua
  Province, Indonesia. Mamberamo Raya Regency itself is a division of
  Sarmi Regency and Waropen Regency on March 15, 2007 with a legal
  basis, namely Law Number 19 of 2007. With an area of 31,136.85 KM2
  with a population according to data from the Ministry of Home Affairs
  in 2024, namely, 40,449 people with a population density of 1.7
  people/km2, consisting of 8 Districts and 60 Villages. [6]</p>
  <p>Warembori is a village located in Mamberamo Hilir District,
  Mamberamo Raya Regency, Papua Province, Indonesia. The area of
  Warembori Village is 2,910 km2, with a population of 501 people.</p>
  <sec id="solutions-that-can-be-taken-to-resolve-land-conflicts-that-occur-in-the-traditional-areas-of-the-warembori-village-community">
    <title>Solutions that can be taken to resolve land conflicts that
    occur in the traditional areas of the Warembori village
    community</title>
    <p>In the 1945 constitution, the state regulates indigenous peoples.
    Article 18B paragraph 2 emphasizes that the state recognizes and
    respects the units of indigenous legal communities and their
    traditional rights as long as they are still alive and in accordance
    with the development of society and the principles of the Unitary
    State of the Republic of Indonesia, which are regulated by law. In
    article 18B, it can be seen that the state guarantees and protects
    the order of indigenous legal communities within the Unitary State
    of the Republic of Indonesia.</p>
    <p>The solution that can be taken to overcome the Land Problem in
    the customary area of the Warembori Village community, as explained
    by Mr. Luhter Rumaikewi as the traditional elder of Warembori
    Village in an interview on November 29, 2024, has gone through a
    discussion process with the local government. In the discussion,
    historical evidence has been presented which is the basis for land
    ownership rights, the problem related to the land dispute was
    actually resolved on September 18, 2013, where both parties
    involved, namely the Warembori village community and the Yoke
    village community, have been resolved peacefully and a statement of
    position by both parties that the Warembori village community will
    continue to live on their land and likewise the Yoke village
    community will continue to live on their land, but the minutes of
    the settlement have not been followed up by the responsible party
    (local government). [7]</p>
    <p>According to Mr. Luhter Rumaikewi, if this problem reappears in
    the future, the best solution that can be taken is through the
    implementation of a customary oath. This is considered the most
    appropriate approach because the resolution process through
    customary law has been witnessed by customary elders from various
    regions, such as Marinavalen, Burmeso and others. [8] Thus, the
    customary oath becomes a resolution mechanism that is respected and
    in accordance with the traditional values of the Warembori Village
    community.</p>
  </sec>
  <sec id="the-mechanism-for-protecting-the-customary-rights-of-the-warembori-village-community-over-land-that-has-been-inhabited-for-generations">
    <title>The mechanism for protecting the customary rights of the
    Warembori village community over land that has been inhabited for
    generations</title>
    <p>Customary rights protection mechanisms are very important to
    protect land and natural resources and avoid problems. This also
    supports the empowerment of indigenous communities as the LEGAL
    owners of their land. [9]</p>
    <p>The weak recognition of customary rights of indigenous legal
    communities causes customary rights to be in a dilemma when faced
    with the right to control or take sides unilaterally with either
    individuals or groups. [10] The mechanism for protecting customary
    rights is as follows:</p>
    <p>Legal Recognition</p>
    <p>Law No. 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Principles (UUPA). In
    UUPA, customary rights are rights held by indigenous communities
    over land and natural resources. [11]</p>
    <p>Registration of Rights</p>
    <p>Indigenous communities need to register their customary rights to
    gain formal recognition. This process involves tracing the history
    and evidence that shows the existence of the customary rights.</p>
    <p>Protection through public policy</p>
    <p>The government needs to create policies that support and protect
    customary rights. For example, by establishing regulations that
    protect customary land from being controlled by other parties
    without the consent of the indigenous community. [12]</p>
    <p>Mediation and Dispute Resolution</p>
    <p>In the case of land disputes, mediation can be carried out
    between the disputing parties (for example, indigenous peoples and
    investors) to reach an agreement. The government can also act as a
    mediator. [13]</p>
    <p>Legal Sanctions</p>
    <p>Violations of customary rights can be subject to legal sanctions.
    [14] This can include administrative or even criminal action for
    violators who harm indigenous communities.</p>
    <p>The Role of Institutions and Organizations</p>
    <p>Humanitarian agencies and non-governmental organizations play an
    active role in fighting for customary rights and providing advocacy
    for indigenous communities.</p>
    <p>From the explanation above regarding the mechanism of protection
    of customary rights seen from the results of the meeting of the
    traditional leaders between the Warembori Village community and the
    Yoke Village community on September 18, 2013, there was also the
    presence of the Mamberamo Raya district government and the
    TNI/Polri, where the results of the decision from the meeting did
    not yet have a LEGAL protection mechanism. However, in the decision
    it was only a joint decision that the customary rights belonged to
    the Warembori village community.</p>
    <p>Based on the observation results obtained by researchers in the
    field, the land dispute problem between the Yoke and Warembori
    villages is still ongoing, where the results of the decision of the
    customary meeting held on September 18, 2013 at the Warembori
    Village soccer field have not been followed up by the responsible
    party (local government), and there is also no protection mechanism
    from the government related to the problem. [15] Researchers found
    problems in the field where the Yoke village community still claims
    that it is their land, based on information and documentation
    obtained by researchers in the field.</p>
  </sec>
</sec>
<sec id="conclusion">
  <title>Conclusion</title>
  <p>The cause of the land dispute between the Yoke and Warembori
  villages was due to social jealousy. The social jealousy in question
  is where the Warembori village community geographically has advantages
  and also the local economic turnover is very fast because the
  Warembori village community is directly connected to public
  transportation. While the Yoke village geographically does not have
  advantages, and also the local economic turnover has not run well
  because it is not directly connected to public transportation.</p>
  <p>The land dispute between Yoke Village and Warembori Village,
  located in Mamberamo Hilir Regency, Mamberamo Raya, Papua, has been
  ongoing since 2013. The conflict centers on land ownership claims,
  with both communities asserting their rights to the disputed area.
  Despite attempts to resolve the issue through customary meetings and
  local government involvement, the issue remains unresolved, leading to
  social tensions between the two groups.</p>
  <p>The land dispute between Yoke Village and Warembori Village is an
  example of the challenges faced by indigenous communities in asserting
  their land rights amidst conflicting claims. Although legal and
  customary frameworks exist, the lack of effective implementation and
  government support hampers resolution efforts. Engaging in dialogue
  and mediation, alongside formal legal recognition, is critical to
  achieving a successful resolution of this conflict.</p>
  <p>From the problem of land disputes between Yoke Village and
  Warembori Village, the solution that can be taken to overcome the
  problem of land in the customary area of the Warembori Village
  community, according to the traditional elders of Warembori Village,
  if this problem reappears in the future, the best solution that can be
  taken is through the implementation of a customary oath. This is
  considered the most appropriate approach because the resolution
  process through custom has been witnessed by traditional elders from
  various regions, such as Marinavalen, Burmeso and others. Thus, the
  customary oath becomes a resolution mechanism that is respected and in
  accordance with the traditional values of the Warembori Village
  community.</p>
  <p>The mechanism for protecting customary rights is very important to
  protect land and natural resources and avoid problems. It also
  supports the empowerment of indigenous communities as the LEGAL owners
  of their land. The weak recognition of customary rights of customary
  law communities causes customary rights to be in a dilemma when faced
  with the right to control or side unilaterally with either individuals
  or groups. A good mechanism for protecting customary rights is legal
  recognition of Law No. 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Principles
  (UUPA). In UUPA, customary rights are rights held by indigenous
  communities to land and natural resources, registration of customary
  rights, communities need to register land in order to get recognition
  and also collect historical evidence, protection through public
  policy, the government can also take policies and protection,
  mediation and dispute resolution here the government must also be a
  mediator so that there is an agreement, legal sanctions if a decision
  has been made and there are those who violate must be subject to legal
  sanctions as regulated. The problem of land disputes between the Yoke
  and Warembori villages until now there has been no protection
  mechanism only in the form of a decision that the land belongs to the
  Warembori village community, until now the Yoke village community
  still claims that it is their land and place. The unilateral claim by
  the Yoke village community can be seen from the houses built at the
  Warembori village port, as well as the many sales huts built at the
  port. Therefore, a protection mechanism is needed so that the Yoke
  village community respects the Warembori village community more.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
</back>
</article>
