<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.2 20190208//EN"
                  "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.2" article-type="other">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id></journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
</journal-title-group>
<issn></issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<permissions>
</permissions>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="introduction">
  <title>INTRODUCTION</title>
  <p>Indonesia is a country based on law , as in a way firm stated in
  Article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of
  Indonesia (UUD NRI 1945) which states that &quot;The State of
  Indonesia is a state based on law .&quot; Where the State of Indonesia
  is based on law on the law of “ rechtaat ”, no based on power merely
  &quot; machstaat &quot;. [1] So it is clear that the mandated
  objectives of the rule of law in the 1945 Constitution not just a
  country based on it law arbitrary . The law that is expected is not
  the law that was formed only based on power , which can culminating in
  power absolute or authoritarian . Such laws That no fair , because No
  based on the principle justice for the people. [2]</p>
  <p>Dynamics problem social Keep going growing and growing increase
  from day to day , so that become something very disturbing as well as
  worrying . [3] One of the problem social up to moment This Not yet
  completed and still become not quite enough answer big together is
  behavior corruption . [4] The role of intelligence prosecutor's office
  in to reveal act criminal corruption is very important , but faced
  with various challenge in effort reach optimal results . Currently ,
  the Pinrang District Attorney's Office has take step significant in
  eradication corruption in its territory , as in the case of suspicion
  corruption committed by the Director of PT Pinrang Sejahtera, initials
  MAA, related to management of the Pinrang Mall Building . [5] In the
  case of this , MAA is set as suspect on suspicion abuse authority that
  causes state losses of up to Rp. 1 billion . [6] This case reflect the
  existence of a modus operandi in management complex state assets , so
  need accuracy as well as skills intelligence prosecutor's office in
  uncover and follow up deviations that occur . [7] However Thus ,
  success in disclosure cases like This faced with various limitations
  source the power possessed by the Pinrang District Attorney's Office .
  [ 8] Challenge main issues faced is limitations amount personnel and
  sophistication equipment or the technology required For support
  operation intelligence . [9] The perpetrator's modus operandi
  increasing corruption​ sophisticated and confidential activity they
  often complicates the collection process information , as seen​ in
  disclosure Pinrang Mall Building case , where the perpetrator utilise
  gap law and ambiguity extension agreement rent For Keep going manage
  building after the rental period ended . [10] Based on background
  behind on so can formulated problem as following : How Function of
  Intelligence Prosecutor in disclose the occurrence suspicion act
  criminal corruption in the city Pinrang (Study at Pinrang District
  Attorney's Office )? And what just Obstacles faced by Intelligence
  Prosecutors in to reveal the occurrence suspicion act criminal
  corruption in the city Pinrang (Study at Pinrang District Attorney's
  Office )?</p>
</sec>
<sec id="method">
  <title>METHOD</title>
  <p>Study This is study law empirical . With do study to type study
  field that is to study provision applicable law​ as well as what
  happened​ in reality in society . [11] Or in other words , namely a
  research conducted​ to condition Actually or condition real in society
  with Meaning For to know and find the facts and data that will needed
  . After the required data collected Then towards identification​ the
  problem that ultimately towards a resolution problem . Every study
  must be always accompanied by with thinking thinking theoretical .
  This is due to Because existence reciprocal relationship​ between
  theory with activities data collection , data construction , data
  management and data analysis . [12]</p>
</sec>
<sec id="discussion">
  <title>DISCUSSION</title>
  <sec id="the-function-of-intelligence-prosecutors-in-revealing-the-occurrence-allegation-action-criminal-corruption-in-pinrang-city-.">
    <title>The Function of Intelligence Prosecutors in Revealing The
    occurrence Allegation Action Criminal Corruption in Pinrang City
    .</title>
    <p>Before discuss about Function Intelligence Pinrang District
    Attorney's Office in disclose the occurrence suspicion act criminal
    corruption , then moreover formerly served about description general
    about Pinrang District Attorney's Office . Pinrang District
    Attorney's Office ( Kejari) Pinrang ) in structural located below​
    South Sulawesi High Prosecutor's Office ( Kejati) South Sulawesi )
    and the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia which
    is located in the Capital City of the State. Regency Pinrang own
    area of 1,961.77 km² with amount resident around 351,118 people and
    the level density resident of 171 people /km². [13] Pinrang District
    Attorney's Office located on Jl. Jend . Sukowati , Kelurahan
    Macorawalie , District The Water Sawitto , Regency Pinrang , South
    Sulawesi, and now This headed by Agung Bagus Kade Kusimantara
    Pinrang District Attorney's Office own mandatory vision and mission​
    applied by all member Pinrang District Attorney's Office For support
    his role as institution enforcer professional , proportional and
    accountable law . Institutions​ This on duty in a way independent
    with to uphold right basic man in accordance the principle of a
    state based on the rule of law of Pancasila, in order to reduce act
    crime . The main purpose from effort This is For create a free
    society from action corruption , whether carried out by the
    authorities and state officials , as well as remove element
    corruption , collusion and nepotism as step in to finish violation
    right basic human . Vision and mission Pinrang District Attorney's
    Office focus on enforcement right basic humans and optimization
    eradication corruption , according to with role The prosecutor's
    office is regulated in Article 2 Paragraph (1) of Law no. 16 of 2004
    concerning The Attorney General's Office of the Republic of
    Indonesia in Constitution the state that . &quot; The Attorney
    General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia which will then in
    Constitution This called prosecutor's office is institution
    implementing government​ state power in the field of prosecution as
    well as other authorities based on law .”. Law Number 16 of 2004
    concerning The Attorney General's Office of the Republic of
    Indonesia regulates about duties , functions and authorities
    Prosecutor's Office as institution enforcer law in Indonesia. In the
    law This , the Prosecutor's Office given role For operate activity
    intelligence in support task investigation , inquiry and prosecution
    , especially in cases act criminal corruption , terrorism and
    violations significant law​ others . The role of intelligence This
    aiming For gather relevant information for the benefit of
    enforcement effective law .​</p>
    <p>Activity intelligence conducted by the Prosecutor's Office is
    also related with Constitution Number 17 of 2011 Article 13
    paragraph ( 2) concerning State Intelligence , stated that . “
    Function Intelligence as referred to in paragraph (1) shall be
    implemented in accordance with provision regulation legislation .”
    Where the Law Number 17 of 2011 Article 1 paragraph (1) explains .
    &quot; Intelligence is knowledge , organization , and related
    activities with formulation policies , national strategies , and
    decision making decision based on analysis from information and
    facts collected​ through method Work For detection and warning early
    in frame prevention , control and mitigation every threat to
    security national .” Intelligence process this is also not only
    limited to efforts preventive , but also includes actions repressive
    If found proof strong on suspicion act criminal corruption . When
    indications Enough clearly , the data analyzed more continued and
    delivered to Field Action Criminal Special For more handling​ in
    depth . Intelligence in the Prosecutor's Office also carries out
    role security intelligence , or PAM, which aims to protect the legal
    process from various form threats , disturbances , obstacles and
    challenges (AGHT) that may occur appears . This PAM become very
    important For ensure that case corruption can processed in a way
    fair without existence pressure from party outside . [14]</p>
    <p>In addition , the field Intelligence The prosecutor's office also
    carried out fundraising intelligence , or GAL, as effort For build
    connection Good with various element society , such as students ,
    organizations society , media and government area . Relationship
    This functioning as effort For detect threat since early and weaving
    Work same who supports effort enforcement law . Information from
    public often helps​ in identification location or the alleged
    situation become place the occurrence act criminal corruption . For
    enrich discussion in study this , will served data table containing
    amount case act criminal corruption in the Regency Pinrang based on
    year , namely during period 2020 to 2024. This data aiming For give
    description quantitative about development amount case corruption in
    the area in period time certain</p>
    <p>NUMBER OF CORRUPTION CASES HANDLED BY</p>
    <p>PROSECUTOR 'S OFFICE ( 2020 to Year 2024)</p>
    <table-wrap>
      <table>
        <colgroup>
          <col width="6%" />
          <col width="41%" />
          <col width="53%" />
        </colgroup>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th>No</th>
            <th>Year</th>
            <th>Amount Case</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td>1.</td>
            <td>2020</td>
            <td>1 Case</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>2.</td>
            <td>2021</td>
            <td>1 Case</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>3.</td>
            <td>2022</td>
            <td>1 Case</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>4.</td>
            <td>2023</td>
            <td>3 Things</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>5.</td>
            <td>2024</td>
            <td>1 Case</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Data Source : Pinrang District Attorney's Office</p>
    <p>The table describe amount case act criminal corruption handled by
    the Pinrang District Attorney's Office during period 2020 to 2024.
    In 2020 to 2022 , every the year there is 1 case being handled , and
    everything has succeed executed . The year 2023 recorded improvement
    moderate with 3 cases handled , and in all has executed . In 2024 ,
    back only there is 1 case being handled , which has also been
    executed . This data reflect that Pinrang District Attorney's Office
    in a way consistent finish all over case corruption handled​ every
    year .</p>
    <p>THEIR OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND ( 2020 to Year 2024)</p>
    <table-wrap>
      <table>
        <colgroup>
          <col width="6%" />
          <col width="11%" />
          <col width="13%" />
          <col width="20%" />
          <col width="19%" />
          <col width="17%" />
          <col width="14%" />
        </colgroup>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th rowspan="2">No</th>
            <th rowspan="2">Year</th>
            <th colspan="5">Background​ Work</th>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <th>civil servant</th>
            <th>Self-employed</th>
            <th>Head / Staff / Treasurer</th>
            <th>State-Owned Enterprises / Regionally-Owned
            Enterprises</th>
            <th>housewife</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td>1.</td>
            <td>2020</td>
            <td>-</td>
            <td>1</td>
            <td>-</td>
            <td>-</td>
            <td>-</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>2.</td>
            <td>2021</td>
            <td>1</td>
            <td>-</td>
            <td>-</td>
            <td>-</td>
            <td>-</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>3.</td>
            <td>2022</td>
            <td>-</td>
            <td>-</td>
            <td>1</td>
            <td>-</td>
            <td>-</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>4.</td>
            <td>2023</td>
            <td>1</td>
            <td>-</td>
            <td>2</td>
            <td>-</td>
            <td>-</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>5</td>
            <td>2024</td>
            <td>-</td>
            <td>1</td>
            <td>-</td>
            <td>-</td>
            <td>-</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Data Source : Pinrang District Attorney's Office</p>
    <p>This table show perpetrator data act criminal corruption based on
    background behind work from 2020 to 2024. In 2020 , only there is
    One the perpetrator who came from from category Self-employed ,
    while other categories no take notes existence perpetrator
    corruption . The year 2021 recorded One perpetrator from category
    Civil Servants ( PNS ), and in 2022 , the perpetrators originate
    from category Village Head / Staff / Treasurer with amount one
    person. The year 2023 becomes year with amount perpetrator the
    highest , namely three people, consisting of from One perpetrator
    from civil servant category and two perpetrators from category
    Village Head / Staff / Treasurer . While that , in 2024 , only One
    registered perpetrators​ from category Self-employed . During period
    This category of BUMN /BUMD and Housewives ( IRT) does not apply
    take notes existence perpetrator corruption . Pinrang District
    Attorney's Office consistent handle all case corruption is accepted
    , with surge cases in 2023. Variations​ amount perpetrator based on
    background behind work show challenge wide in eradicate corruption
    in various sector , especially in the same year . In general overall
    , category most frequent jobs recorded are civil servants,
    self-employed , and village heads / staff / treasurers , with
    variation amount different actors​ each the year . [15]</p>
  </sec>
  <sec id="obstacles-faced-intelligence-prosecutors-office-in-revealing-allegation-action-criminal-corruption-.">
    <title>Obstacles Faced​ Intelligence Prosecutor's Office in Revealing
    Allegation Action Criminal Corruption .</title>
    <p>In an attempt eradication act criminal corruption ( tipikor ),
    Prosecutor's Office often face various obstacles , whether
    originating from from internal and external external . Barriers This
    appear along with condition Prosecutor's Office in carry out task
    eradication corruption . Eradication corruption No only become not
    quite enough answer apparatus enforcer laws and institutions related
    , but also a duties and obligations all over element nation , so
    that expected to Indonesia's future can avoid from problem
    corruption . Action criminal corruption is act classified crimes​ as
    an extraordinary crime or crime outside normal because perpetrator
    use mode with complex methods and patterns​ in to launch his actions
    . The perpetrator corruption tend make an effort reverse truth to
    influence enforcer law . [16] Therefore , from That in operate his
    duties , Intelligence Prosecutor's Office experience various
    obstacles . According to Fauzan Eka Prasetia , as Head of
    Intelligence Pinrang District Attorney's Office state that . There
    are several constraint in disclosure suspicion act criminal
    corruption . [17] Usage budget sourced from from the APBN/APBD
    carried out in a way No transparent so that make it difficult
    Prosecutor's Office For do supervision . Limited budget in the Table
    of Contents Implementation Budget (DIPA) owned Prosecutor's Office .
    In the implementation disclosure corruption often need sufficient
    budget​ big , especially For provide team expert certain that require
    cost big , for example expert construction , while in the budget
    DIPA For expert Already determined the amount is not in accordance
    with need expert mentioned . [18]</p>
    <p>District Attorney's Office has not yet supported with tool
    wiretapping , while in Article 30C letter i given authority For do
    tapping based on Constitution special that regulates about
    wiretapping and conducting center monitoring in the field act
    criminal . Field Intelligence Prosecutor's Office No can Again do
    investigation open with do summons through invitation to parties
    that need to requested statement .” Considering existence various
    obstacles faced by the Intelligence Team in operate task , requires
    a strategy to increase role Sexy Intelligence use to reveal
    suspicion act criminal corruption in a way effective . Disclosure
    case corruption No can done in a way independent so that need
    participation from various party . Fauzan Eka Prasetia , stated that
    one of steps taken​ is strengthen network with various element
    society , such as observers , students , institutions self-reliance
    community (NGOs), journalists or media, until public general .
    Strengthening network This aiming For to obtain information small
    However significant that can support task intelligence , especially
    remember limitations amount owned personnel . This effort done
    through personal approach , such as to weave informal communication
    in places strategic or through fundraising information in the
    environment housing area . In its implementation , technique
    disguise often used For digging up important data related to the
    target of the investigation . Information This can obtained Good in
    a way directly by the officer intelligence and through Work The same
    with informant .</p>
  </sec>
</sec>
<sec id="conclusion">
  <title>CONCLUSION</title>
  <p>Function of Intelligence Prosecutor in to reveal suspicion act
  criminal corruption in the Prosecutor's Office involving various role
  important to support the effective investigation and prosecution
  process . Intelligence Prosecutor do fundraising information with
  community , journalists , and NGOs, as well as disguise For identify
  potential act criminal . In addition , intelligence play a role in
  operation monitoring For ensure proof No removed and helped to reveal
  network perpetrator corruption . With function this , intelligence
  support The District Attorney's Office in effort eradicate corruption
  in a way effective and prevent state losses are greater continue . In
  running his duties , Intelligence Prosecutor face various obstacles ,
  both internal and external external . Internal obstacles include
  limited​ budget For to fund investigations that require team experts ,
  and limitations source Power humans . In addition , the unavailability
  tool adequate wiretapping​ become constraint significant in the process
  of investigation . As for the obstacles external faced​ covers
  existence pressure from parties certain who are trying thwart the
  legal process , and non-transparency in use budget from the APBN/APBD
  which makes it difficult supervision . Although Thus , the
  Intelligence Prosecutor still committed For carry out his job in a way
  professional in accordance procedure applicable law .​ Increase
  effectiveness of Intelligence Prosecutor in to reveal suspicion act
  criminal corruption must required strengthening source Power man
  through training specializing in the field investigation corruption .
  In addition , procurement supporting tools and technologies , such as
  device legitimate and sophisticated wiretapping , must​ become priority
  main . and its importance expand network Work The same with society ,
  media, institutions self-reliance community (NGOs), and institutions
  related use to obtain information accurate and relevant start​ in
  support the investigation process.To overcome Intelligence
  Prosecutor's Obstacle in to reveal act criminal corruption , necessary
  done improvement budget For investigation , provision team experts ,
  and procurement tool legitimate wiretapping . Regulations that
  strengthen​ the authority of the Intelligence Prosecutor , in
  particular in investigation open , also necessary fixed .</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
</back>
</article>
