Judges’ Legal Reasoning in Determining the Success or Failure of Diversion in Juvenile Justice: A Normative Analysis of Indonesian Court Decisions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56087/enf7mg34Keywords:
Diversion; Juvenile Justice, Juvenile Justice, Judicial Discretion, Child ProtectionAbstract
This study examines judges’ legal reasoning in determining the success or failure of diversion in juvenile cases within Indonesia’s Juvenile Criminal Justice System. Using a normative juridical approach with a doctrinal character, the research analyzes statutory provisions under Law Number 11 of 2012 and selected district court decisions that reflect diverse diversion outcomes. The findings reveal that although diversion is an imperative legal mandate, its implementation varies significantly in judicial practice. Diversion may succeed substantively when judges actively facilitate restorative dialogue and involve probation officers effectively, but it may fail when reduced to procedural formality or financial compensation negotiations. The study also identifies instances where diversion is entirely omitted despite meeting normative requirements, reflecting a persistent retributive bias in juvenile adjudication. These inconsistencies demonstrate that diversion outcomes are strongly influenced by judicial discretion, victim willingness, socio-economic factors, and the availability of non-material restoration mechanisms. The study concludes that diversion must be reinforced as a substantive right of the child rather than a mere administrative obligation. Strengthening judicial guidelines, enhancing probation services, and promoting restorative justice-oriented judicial training are essential to ensure consistent, child-centered, and restorative diversion practices
References
Asa, A. I., Syamsuddin, M. M., Wahyudi, A., & Hamzah, A. (2025). Aliran Filsafat Hukum Sebagai Cara Pandang (Worldview) Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Pidana. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 7(2), 20-48.
Beijing Rules. (1985). United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice. United Nations.
Budiaulia, M. F., & Ahmad, S. (2024). Pelaksanaan Diversi Terhadap Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum:(Studi Putusan No. 6/Pid. Sus. Anak/2019/PN Sdr). JURNAL SYNTAX IMPERATIF: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan, 5(2), 312-323.
Munggardijaya, A., Hernawati, H., Kurniati, Y., & Susanti, R. A. (2025). Implementasi Diversi Terhadap Tindak Pidana yang Dilakukan oleh Anak Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 20212 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 5(3), 2214-2232.
Muladi. (2019). Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Nahda, A., Donita, Z. Z., Syahrin, A., Siregar, A. R., Rahman, A., & Sigalingging, A. A. A. (2025). Diversi Dalam Perspektif Psikologi Anak. Judge: Jurnal Hukum, 6(01), 275-281
Rahardjo, S. (2009). Hukum Progresif: Hukum yang Membebaskan. Jakarta: Kompas.
Rahayu, S. (2015). Diversi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Yang Dilakukan Anak Dalam Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jambi, 6(1), 43317
Riza, F., & Sibarani, F. A. (2021). Prinsip The Best Interest of The Child dalam Proses Peradilan Anak (Vol. 1). umsu press
Setyowati, S. (2024). Problematika Penerapan Diversi Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Anak Dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan Restoratif. Unes Law Review, 6(4), 11679-11693.
Sudewo, F. A. (2021). Pendekatan Restorative Justice Bagi Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum. Penerbit Nem .
UNICEF. (2020). Child Justice and Restorative Approaches. New York: UNICEF.
UNODC. (2021). Handbook on Restorative Justice Programmes (2nd ed.). Vienna: United Nations.
Walgrave, L. (2022). Restorative Justice, Self-Interest and Responsible Citizenship. London: Routledge.
Zehr, H. (2015). The Little Book of Restorative Justice (Revised ed.). New York: Good Books.
Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2014 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Diversi dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Anwar Dahlan, Muhammad Rinaldy Bima, Hardianto Djanggih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
