Keserentakan Pemilu 2024 yang Paling Ideal Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia
Abstract
The holding of concurrent elections on April 17 2019 is a new history in the general election process in Indonesia. This is the implication of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 14 /PUU/2013 on the review of Law Number 42 of 2008 concerning the Election of President and Vice President. Although simultaneous elections have been considered better than previous elections, it does not mean that there are no shortcomings in the implementation. The most appalling problem is the large number of fatalities by the election organizers who are seen as the impact of the 2019 concurrent elections as well as other technical problems. Looking at various aspects raised from the 2019 elections, the Association for Elections and Democracy (Perludem) conducted a review of the material of the Law on the 1945 Constitution to the Constitutional Court as outlined in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 55/PUU-XVII/2019. In their argument, the petitioner conveys a number of things related to the analysis that has been carried out in the holding of simultaneous elections held in 2019 yesterday. In the results of the decision, the Constitutional Court rejected the petition of the petitioner in its entirety because it was considered to be groundless. However, the Constitutional Court provides choices regarding election models that can be chosen and considered constitutional based on the 1945 Constitution.
References
Administrator. (2018, 16 May). Evaluasi Satu Tahun Penyelenggaraan Pemilu (KPU dan BAWASLU) Periode 2017-2022. Perkumpulan untuk Pemilu dan Demokrasi. Retrieved from http://perludem.org/2018/05/16/hasil-evaluasi-satu-tahun-kpu-dan-bawaslu-periode-2017-2021/, at the date of 19 September 2020.
Ahmadi, A. (2015). Analisis Konstruksi Hukum Konstitusionalitas Pemilu Serentak pada Tahun 2019. Al-'Adl, 8(1), 1-19.
Aileen, J. (2014, 15 May). Pemilu Serentak Di Tahun 2019, Kenapa Tidak Tahun Ini? LBH Jakarta. Retrieved from https://bantuanhukum.or.id/pemilu-serentak-di-tahun-2019-kenapa-tidak-tahun-ini/, at the date of 18 April 2020.
Ansori, L. (2017). Telaah terhadap Presidential Threshold dalam Pemilu Serentak 2019. Jurnal Yuridis, 4(1), 15-27. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.35586/.v4i1.124
Azed, A. B. & Amir, M. (2006). Pemilu dan Partai Politik di Indonesia. Jakarta: UI Press.
Efriza, E. (2019). Penguatan Sistem Presidensial dalam Pemilu Serentak 2019. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 16(1), 1-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v16i1.772
Farisa, F. C. (2019, 27 May). KPU Sebut Partisipasi Pemilih pada Pemilu 2019 Capai 81 Persen. Kompas.com. Retrieved from https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2019/05/27/16415251/kpu-sebut-partisipasi-pemilih-pada-pemilu-2019-capai-81-persen, at the date of 12 July 2020.
Gai, A. & Tokan, F. B. (2020). Analisa Dampak Penyelenggaraan Pemilu Serentak dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Demokrasi di Indonesia: Studi Kasus Penyelenggaraan Pemilu di Kota Kupang-Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur Tahun 2019. Warta Governare: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 1(1), 109-128.
Haris, S. (Ed.) (2016). Haris. Pemilu Nasional Serentak 2019. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar bekerja sama dengan Electoral Research Institute (ERI) dan Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (LIPI).
Hayat, H. (2016). Korelasi Pemilu Serentak dengan Multi Partai Sederhana sebagai Penguatan Sistem Presidensial. Jurnal Konstitusi, 11(3), 468-491.
Huda, N. m. & Nasef, M. I. (2017). Penataan Demokrasi & Pemilu di Indonesia Pasca Reformasi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Junaidi, V. (2009). Menata Sistem Penegakan Hukum Pemilu Demokratis Tinjauan Kewenangan MK atas Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hasil Pemilu. Jurnal Konstitusi, 6(3), 103-143.
Kamil, A. B. (2017). "Relevansi Pemilihan Umum Serentak Presiden dengan Legislatif terhadap Penguatan Sistem Presidensial di Indonesia (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013)". Bachelor Thesis. Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah.
Mainwaring, S. (1993). Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy: The Difficult Combination. Comparative Political Studies, 26(2), 198-228. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0010414093026002003
Mamonto, M. A. W. W. (2019). Legal Politics of Simplifying Political Parties in Indonesia (Case Study of 2004 – 2014 Election). Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, 2(1), 1-20. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.33096/substantivejustice.v2i1.25
Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Mashabi, S. (2020, 22 January). Refleksi Pemilu 2019, Sebanyak 894 Petugas KPPS Meninggal Dunia. Kompas.com. Retrieved from https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2020/01/22/15460191/refleksi-pemilu-2019-sebanyak-894-petugas-kpps-meninggal-dunia, at the date of 9 June 2020.
Nuhrawati, A. (2018). Hukum dan Demokrasi Jalan Menuju Kesejahteraan Rakyat. Pleno Jure, 7(2), 16-27.
Pahlevi, I. (2015). Pemilu Serentak dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Indonesia. Jakarta: P3DI Setjen DPR RI Kerja Sama Azza Grafika.
Prasetyoningsih, N. (2014). Dampak Pemilihan Umum Serentak bagi Pembangunan Demokrasi Indonesia. Jurnal Media Hukum, 21(2), 241-263.
R., H. Y. A. (2010). Presidensialisme Setengah Hati: Dari Dilema ke Kompromi. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Saubani, A. (2019, 18 April). Denny JA Soroti Dampak Negatif Pilpres dan Pileg Serentak. Republika.co.id. Retrieved from https://www.republika.co.id/berita/nasional/politik/19/04/18/pq5t85409-denny-ja-soroti-dampak-negatif-pilpres-dan-pileg-serentak, at the date of 5 June 2020.
Stoll, H. (2015). Presidential Coattails: A Closer Look. Party Politics, 21(3), 417-427. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1354068813487102
Triono, T. (2017). Menakar Efektivitas Pemilu Serentak 2019. Jurnal Wacana Politik, 2(2), 156-164. doi: https://doi.org/10.24198/jwp.v2i2.14205
