Investigations on Suspect Forgery of Documentary: A Case Study at the South Sulawesi Regional Police

  • Susi Aryani Manangin Universitas Negeri Manado
  • La Ode Husen Universitas Muslim Indonesia
  • Abd. Kahar Muzakkir Universitas Sawerigading Makassar
  • Abd. Rasjak Universitas Muslim Indonesia
Keywords: Documentary Evidence Instruments, Forgery, Investigation, Suspect

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness and obstacles of investigations on suspect forgery of documentary evidence instruments of land rights at the Directorate of the General Criminal Investigation of South Sulawesi Regional Police. This research combines normative juridical and empirical research methods. The primary data were collected using direct interviews, while the secondary data was collected using literature study techniques. The data obtained in this research were then analyzed qualitatively to describe problems and answer study purposes. The results show that the effectiveness of investigations on suspect forgery of documentary evidence instruments of land rights at the Directorate of the General Criminal Investigation of South Sulawesi Regional Police consists of the investigator's role, the document's validity, and the facilities. In contrast, inhibiting factors of investigations on suspect forgery of documentary evidence instruments of land rights at the Directorate of the General Criminal Investigation of South Sulawesi Regional Police consist of the factor of witness testimony and the legal culture of the community. Therefore, it is recommended that the Government conduct legal counseling to the public to create legal awareness to obey and comply with the laws and regulations that have been in force for the realization of legal purposes in the future.

References

Alimuddin, N. H. (2021). Implementasi Sertifikat Elektronik sebagai Jaminan Kepastian Hukum Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah di Indonesia. Sasi, 27(3), 335-345. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v27i3.509

Ayudiatri, S., & Cahyono, A. B. (2022). The Legality of Grants by Foreign Citizens on Land Objects in Indonesia: Case Studies of Court Decisions. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(1), 30-45. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v4i1.131

Circular of the Attorney General’s Office of the Republic of Indonesia Number SE-003/JA/2/1984 on the Testimony of an Expert Regarding Signature and Writing as Proof.

Efrianto, D., Herman, H., & Haris, O. K. (2021). Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Kepala Desa terhadap Penerbitan Surat Keterangan Tanah. Halu Oleo Legal Research, 3(2), 123-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.33772/holresch.v3i2.21446

Fitrah, F. A., Takariawan, A., & Muttaqin, Z. (2021). The Position of Civil Servant Investigator of Directorate General of Tax (DGT) in the Frame of Taxation Criminal Law Enforcement in Indonesia. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 3(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v3i1.107

Friedman, L. M. (1984). American Law: An Introduction. W. W. Norton & Company.

Hairan, H., & Datau, R. (2020). Kebijakan Formulasi Hukum Pidana terhadap Tindak Pidana Pertanahan di Indonesia. Gorontalo Law Review, 3(1), 17-39. https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v3i1.907

Hakim, E. (2019, March 18). Polemik Kasus Pemalsuan Surat yang Libatkan Juragan Emas di Makassar. PT Liputan Enam Dot Com. Retrieved August 28, 2019, from https://www.liputan6.com/regional/read/3919080/polemik-kasus-pemalsuan-surat-yang-libatkan-juragan-emas-di-makassar

Husen, L. O., Salle, S., Syalman, A. A., & Muzakkir, A. K. (2020). Pengamanan Intelijen Kepolisian Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Atas Objek Sengketa. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 1(2), 136-148. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v1i2.62

Irwansyah. (2021). Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel (Revision Edition). Mirra Buana Media.

Ismail, M., & Rifai, A. (2021). Menyoal Putusan Hakim dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat. Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 4(2), 177-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.30595/jhes.v4i2.11952

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1946 on Penal Code Regulations.

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1960 on Amendment of the Penal Code (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1960 Number 1, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1921).

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 1981 on the Code of Criminal Procedure (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1981 Number 76, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3209).

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2002 on the State Police of the Republic of Indonesia (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2002 Number 2, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4168).

Manangin, S. A., & Rasjak, A. (2022). The Suspect’s Rights in the Investigation Process: A Case Study at the South Sulawesi Regional Police. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 25(1), 46-62. https://doi.org/10.56087/aijih.v25i1.361

Misranto, M., & Akhmad, S. N. (2019). Kekuatan Akta Autentik yang Dibuat oleh Notaris untuk Pembuktian terhadap Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan. Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan, 3(1), 84-99. https://doi.org/10.33474/hukeno.v3i1.1921

Nasution, A. Z. H. (2020). Pengaruh Sumber Daya Manusia Penyidik terhadap Keberhasilan Penyidikan (Studi pada Satreskrim Polres Dharmasraya). Unes Law Review, 3(1), 104-112. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v3i1.150

Nauli, M. (2019). Pandangan Konstitusi terhadap Notaris (Studi Kasus Putusan MK terhadap Notaris). Recital Review, 1(1), 82-95. https://doi.org/10.22437/rr.v1i1.6110

Nurjannah, T., & Muin, F. (2016). Penyelesaian Sengketa Sertifikat Ganda Hak Atas Tanah (Studi Kasus pada Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Makassar). Tomalebbi: Jurnal Pemikiran, Penelitian Hukum, Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 3(2), 131-145.

Purba, I. P. (2017). Penguatan Budaya Hukum Masyarakat untuk Menghasilkan Kewarganegaraan Transformatif. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 14(2), 146-153. http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/civics.v14i2.16050

Putri, D. A. M., & Silviana, A. (2022). The Transfer of Land Rights through Oral Grants: A Case Studies of Court Decision. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(1), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v4i1.176

Qamar, N., & Rezah, F. S. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Doktrinal dan Non-Doktrinal. CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn).

Rachman, F., Diwirya, I. J., & Kartadinata, A. (2022). Tinjauan Yuridis Penegakan Hukum terhadap Praktek Pemalsuan Surat Keterangan Tanah di Provinsi Lampung. Viva Themis: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(2), 129-145. https://doi.org/10.24967/vt.v5i2.1770

Said, A. (2012). Tolak Ukur Penilaian Penggunaan Diskresi oleh Polisi dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 1(1), 147-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/jhp.1.1.2012.147-170

Sampara, S., & Husen, L. O. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Kretakupa Print.

Soekanto, S. (2013). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Suhyana, F. A., Suseno, S., & Ramli, T. S. (2021). Transaksi Ilegal Menggunakan Kartu ATM Milik Orang Lain. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 2(2), 138-156. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v2i2.92

Taqiyyah, M. A., & Winanti, A. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Sertifikat Atas Tanah Ganda Berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah No. 24 Tahun 1997. Jurnal Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial, 5(1), 77-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/justisia.v5i1.7272

Published
2022-11-30
How to Cite
Manangin, S. A., Husen, L. O., Muzakkir, A. K., & Rasjak, A. (2022). Investigations on Suspect Forgery of Documentary: A Case Study at the South Sulawesi Regional Police. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 25(2), 129-142. https://doi.org/10.56087/aijih.v25i2.367