Regulation of Covernotes by Notaries, Land Deed Making Officials (PPAT) Against Parties in Bank Credit Agreements

Ananda Magvirah  Sofyan; Muhammad Rinaldy  Bima; Sri  Lestari

Ananda Magvirah Sofyan Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Indonesia
Muhammad Rinaldy Bima Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Indonesia
Sri Lestari Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Indonesia

Keywords: Covernote, Notary, Banking Credit Agreement

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal consequences of the issuance of Covernote by Notary / PPAT on the parties to a banking credit agreement, identify potential legal problems due to delays or discrepancies in the documents promised in Covernote, and provide an understanding of the role and limitations of Covernote in banking practice as a supporting document for credit guarantees. The method used in this research is empirical juridical with a qualitative descriptive approach, where data is obtained through interviews with Notary / PPAT, banks, and debtors related to the issuance of Covernote, as well as through document studies and relevant laws and regulations. The results show that Covernote does not have binding legal force as a credit guarantee, but is often a reference in the process of disbursing funds by banks. The legal consequences can be in the form of default risk for the debtor if the documents promised in the Covernote cannot be fulfilled, as well as the potential legal responsibility for Notary / PPAT if there is negligence in its issuance. The implications of this research emphasize the need for caution in the issuance of Covernote so as not to cause legal problems for the parties. In addition, banks as creditors need to understand the limitations of Covernote in guaranteeing legal certainty over mortgage rights. The recommendations of this research emphasize the need for clearer regulations related to the issuance of Covernote by Notary/PPAT in order to provide legal protection for all parties involved in banking credit agreements.

References

S. E. W. Denny Saputra, “PRINSIP KEHATI-HATIAN BAGI NOTARIS/PPAT DALAM MENJALANKAN TUPOKSINYA DALAM UPAYA PENCEGAHAN KRIMINALISASI BERDASARKAN KODE ETIK,” Jurna Akta, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2016.

S. Abdillah, “Batasan Kewenangan dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris-PPAT dalam Edukasi Prosedur Pembuatan Akta Otentik Ditinjau dari Pasal 51 KUHP,” J. Educ. Res., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 67–72, 2023, doi: 10.37985/jer.v4i1.125.

P. B. F. Pintoko, “Intelectual Dader Dibidang Perpajakandalam Melaksanakan Tugas Jabatan ”,” J. Educ. Dev. Inst. Pendidik. Tapanuli Selatan, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 148–152, 2021.

M. G. S. K. Sari, I Gusti Agung Dhenita., Wairocana, I Gusti Ngurah., Resen, “Kewenangan-Notaris-dan-PPAT-,” J. Ilm. Prodi Magister Kenotariatan, no. 201 8, pp. 41–58, 2017.

LIDYA CHRISTINA WARDHANI, “TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS/PPAT TERHADAP AKTA YANG DIBATALKAN OLEH PENGADILAN,” J. Akunt., vol. 11, 2017.

D. Nur Azra, F. Annisa Qutrunnadaa, Y. Simamora, R. Dio Wijatmika, and F. Siswajayanthy, “Perkembangan dan Pembaharuan Terhadap Hukum Perdata di Indonesia Beserta Permasalahan Eksekusi dan Mediasi,” Al-Zayn J. Ilmu Sos. Huk., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 65–69, 2024, doi: 10.61104/alz.v2i1.204.

S. B. Santoso and A. Suliantoro, “Perlindungan Konsumen Pengguna Ojek Online Grab di Kabupaten Kendal,” Transparansi Huk., vol. 6, no. 2, p. hlm. 106., 2023.

F. S. Rahayu, “Menyembuhkan Atau Semakin Melukai: Perkembangan Teknologi Transportasiumum Jalan Raya,” J. Sist. Inf., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 22, 2013.

M. Rafli, M. Rinaldy Bima, and Y. Adha Hamzah, “Peran Notaris dalam Pengaturan Hak Ahli Waris dalam Kasus Warisan Tanah dan Properti Di Kepulauan Selayar,” Qawanin J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 45–61, 2024, doi: 10.56087/qawaninjih.v5i1.471.

N. Qamar et al., “Metode Penelitian Hukum (Legal Research Methods),” no. December, p. 176, 2017.

A. Mutmainnah, M. Hafidz, and M. R. Bima, “Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Tanggung Jawab Notaris,” Kalabbirang Law J., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 14–29, 2020, doi: 10.35877/454ri.kalabbirang27.

A. Fadhila and P. Putra, “Legal Protection for Indonesian Ship Crews in the Free Seas,” vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 50–67, 2024.

A. H. P. K. Putra, M. Nasir, and A. P. Buana, “Mengungkap Keberhasilan Tax Amnesty : Studi Kasus pada KPP Pajak Pratama Makassar Utara,” J. Akunt. dan Pajak, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 60, 2018, doi: 10.29040/jap.v19i1.207.

A. Prawira Buana, H. Hasbi, M. Kamal, and A. Aswari, “Implikasi Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Jual Beli Telepon Seluler Ilegal (Black Market),” JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum), vol. 6, no. 1, p. 117, 2020, doi: 10.33760/jch.v6i1.268.

N. Qamar, M. Syarif, D. S. Busthami, H. Khalid, F. S. Rezah, and A. K. Muzakkir, “Menguak Nilai Kearifan Lokal Bugis Makassar : Perspektif Hukum dan Pemerintahan,” CV. Soc. Polit. Genius, no. January, pp. 0–3, 2018.

A. Asy’ari Zaenal, A. S. Rahman, and A. Razak, “Kewenangan Badan Pertanahan Nasional Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah,” J. Lex Theory, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 318–336, 2024.

N. Qamar and F. S. Rezah, “The Dichotomy of Approach in the Study of Legal Science: A Critical Review,” SIGn J. Huk., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 191–201, 2022, doi: 10.37276/sjh.v4i2.162.

S. Supandi, A. M. Fahmal, and S. Sampara, “the Influence of Islamic Sharia on the Constitution of the Republic Indonesia,” Meraja J., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 319–333, 2020, doi: 10.33080/mrj.v3i3.139.