Implementation of Decentralization Principles in Constitutional Law: Challenges and Opportunities in the Era of Regional Autonomy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56087/yym78m20Keywords:
Decentralization, Regional Autonomy, Regional GovernmentAbstract
Decentralization is an important instrument in the administration of regional government because it provides local governments with greater authority to manage governmental affairs in accordance with the needs and characteristics of local communities while encouraging increased public participation in governance processes. However, its implementation continues to face various challenges, particularly limited human resource capacity among regional government officials, unclear distribution of authority between the central and regional governments, weak inter-institutional coordination, low levels of transparency and accountability in budget management, and disparities in development among regions. This study employs a normative juridical research method. It argues that the effectiveness of decentralization is not determined solely by the delegation of authority to regional governments, but also depends on institutional capacity, clarity in the distribution of authority, effective supervision, and public participation in the administration of government. The findings indicate that strengthening the capacity of regional governments, increasing public participation, promoting innovation in public services, enhancing coordination between the central and regional governments, and improving transparency and accountability are essential measures for optimizing the implementation of decentralization. By strengthening these aspects, decentralization can contribute to more effective, responsive, and democratic regional governance that is oriented toward improving the quality of public services and enhancing community welfare.
References
[1] I. H. Addas, “Daerah Otorita Ibu Kota Negara : Koherensi Status Daerah Pada Ibu Kota Negara Nusantara Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Pemerintahan Daerah Di Indonesia,” Unes Law Rev., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 12744–12756, 2024.
[2] J. I. Rafsanjani, R. B. Prasetio, and Z. H. Anggayudha, “HUKUM PROGRESIF The Existence of Community Service Punishment in A Progressive Legal Perspective,” vol. 23, pp. 219–230, 2023.
[3] D. Darmawanto, M. R. Bima, and M. F. Ramadhan, “Catching the Perpetrators of Dangerous Cosmetics : Between Intention and Absolute Responsibility,” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2025.
[4] E. A. Killick and M. D. Griffiths, “Sports Betting Advertising : A Systematic Review of Content Analysis Studies,” Int. J. Ment. Health Addict., vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 3076–3102, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11469-022-00775-4.
[5] E. Tuschick, N. Carthy, N. Wager, and M. Chamberlain, “A Qualitative Systematic Review of the Barriers and Facilitators of the Reintegration of Men Convicted of a Sexual Offense From Prison or Secure Care into the Community,” 2024, doi: 10.1177/15248380241254080.
[6] F. Hukum, U. Sam, and R. Manado, “PROBLEMATIKA PERATURAN DAERAH ANTARA TANTANGAN DAN PELUANG BERINVESTASI DI ERA OTONOMI DAERAH,” vol. XVIII, no. 1, pp. 104–122, 2010.
[7] T. Hukum and T. Negara, “OTONOMI DAERAH SEBAGAI INSTRUMEN DEMOKRATISASI LOKAL TINJAUAN HUKUM TATA NEGARA,” vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 324–334, 2025, doi: 10.59971/jamapedik.v2i3.420.
[8] R. F. Pertiwi, “Tantangan Hukum Dalam Pelaksanaan Otonomi Daerah Di Era Digital,” vol. 1, pp. 402–405, 2025.
[9] N. G. Priandana et al., “IMPLEMENTASI GOOD GOVERNANCE SEBAGAI UPAYA,” vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 1136–1147, 2025.
[10] D. Simanjutak, A. Z. Widjanarka, D. Fajriyatdinansyah, and K. Nurra, “Desentralisasi dalam Negara Kesatuan : Implikasi terhadap Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah di Indonesia,” vol. 2, no. 2, 2026.
[11] S. Rahmawati, “Desentralisasi dan Otonomi Daerah : Tantangan dan Peluang dalam Era Reformasi,” vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 121–141.
[12] H. Lathifah, A. Frinaldi, and L. Magriasti, “Transformasi Kebijakan Desentralisasi Di Indonesia Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Stabilitas Pemerintahan Daerah Di Era Globalisasi,” vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 577–584, 2024.
[13] D. J. A. Hehanussa et al., METODE PENELITIAN HUKUM. CV WIDINA MEDIA UTAMA, 2023.
[14] T. A. A. Wibowo, “Politik Hukum Desain Otonomi Khusus Ibu Kota Nusantara,” Staatsr. J. Huk. Kenegaraan dan Polit. Islam, vol. 2, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.14421/staatsrecht.v2i2.2810.
[15] P. P. U.-U. B. Keahlian and S. J. D. P. R. RI, “Strategi Pengelolaan Otonomi Khusus Papua Jilid Kedua,” Susunan Dewan Redaksi, vol. 10, p. 23, 2022.
[16] I. M. Suwandi and A. S. Yahya, “Refleksi Otonomi Daerah di Indonesia,” J. Lex Libr., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 887–896, 2019.
[17] M. R. Nurdin, “Desentralisasi Dan Kekhususan Pelaksanaan Otonomi Daerah Otorita Ibu Kota Nusantara,” J. Lex Renaiss., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 617–633, 2022, doi: 10.20885/jlr.vol7.iss3.art12.
[18] A. B. Deni Syaputra1, “Desentralisasi dan Otonomi Daerah: Evaluasi Implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 di Era Pemerintahan Digital,” J. Thengkyang, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 76–96, 2025.
[19] Y. Oktavia, A. Frinaldi, L. Magriasti, and H. Naldi, “DESENTRALISASI DAN OTONOMI PEMERINTAHAN DAERAH : STUDI LITERATUR TENTANG DINAMIKA KEBIJAKAN PEMERINTAHAN DAERAH PASCA-REFORMASI DOI :,” vol. 4, pp. 157–165, 2025.
[20] D. Tantangan, “Almufi Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora Perlindungan Hak Atas Tanah Masyarakat Adat di Era Otonomi,” vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 69–77, 2024.
[21] M. Y. Andres, “Analisis Pelaksanaan Otonomi Daerah dalam Perspektif Hukum Tata Negara,” vol. 3, pp. 929–943, 2026.
[22] S. Zaskia, T. B. Sembiring, J. Berkat, F. Harefa, M. A. Aditya, and R. Zebua, “Dampak Kebijakan Desentralisasi Terhadap Otonomi Daerah dalam Kerangka Hukum Tata Negara,” vol. 5, pp. 639–649, 2025.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Khaidir Kahfi Natsir, Eren Arif Budiman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
