Between Testamentary Freedom and Heirs’ Rights: Questioning the State’s Legal Policy on Legitime Portie Protection in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56087/jd5n0b08Keywords:
Testamentary Freedom, Legitieme Portie, Heirs’ RightsAbstract
Inheritance law plays an important role in ensuring legal certainty in the transfer of rights over an estate while simultaneously protecting the interests of heirs. In practice, a will serves as an instrument that enables a person to determine the disposition of their property after death. Problems arise when testamentary freedom potentially reduces or even eliminates the legally protected reserved portion belonging to certain heirs. This situation creates tension between the principle of testamentary freedom and the principle of protecting heirs’ rights. This study employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches. It argues that testamentary freedom cannot be regarded as an absolute right but must be understood within the framework of legal protection for the legitieme portie as a limitation on the testator’s individual autonomy. The findings show that a will retains legal standing as an expression of the testator’s final wishes, but its enforceability is limited when its provisions diminish the protected reserved portion of the heirs. In such circumstances, disadvantaged heirs have a legal basis to seek reduction (inkorting) of testamentary dispositions that exceed the portion lawfully available for disposition. These findings demonstrate that inheritance law places wills and legitieme portie in a mutually limiting relationship, thereby recognizing testamentary freedom without eliminating the protection of heirs’ reserved rights. Accordingly, the protection of legitieme portie reflects an effort to maintain a balance between the testator’s autonomy and fairness for heirs within the system of civil inheritance law.
References
[1] M. AmmarNurHandyka, “Globalisasi Dalam Dinamika Kontemporer: Studi Kasus Perubahan Sosial Dan Transformasi Budaya,” J. Econ. Technol. Soc. Humanit., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.59945/emnmbp86.
[2] Ahmad Hunaeni Zulkarnaen, “SISTEM HUKUM HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL PANCASILA DANPRODUKTIVITAS PERUSAHAAN DAN KESEJAHTERAANPEKERJA/BURUH,” Res Nullius Law J., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–16, Jan. 2019, Accessed: Apr. 05, 2025. [Online]. Available: http://ojs.unikom.ac.id/index.php/law
[3] M. G. Rahman, S. Tomayahu, F. Syariah, I. Sultan, and A. Gorontalo, “Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia,” Gorontalo, Indonesia, Mar. 2020. [Online]. Available: http://journal.iaingorontalo.ac.id/index.php/ah
[4] P. K. Sosial, “Kebijakan formulasi dalam ruu kuhp terhadap pidana kerja sosial sebagai alternatif pidana penjara,” vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 707–713, 2022.
[5] K. K. Nawawi Fakultas Agama Islam UIKA Bogor Jl Sholeh Iskandar, “Harta Bersama Menurut Hukum Islam dan Perundang-undangan di Indonesia * (TREASURE HOUSEHOLDS ACCORDING TO ISLAMIC LAW AND POSITIVE LAW IN INDONESIA),” 2013.
[6] Y. A. Hamzah and A. A. Mangarengi, “The Authority of PPAT in Making AJB Related to Heritage Land Owned by a Minor,” SIGn J. Huk., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 364–375, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.37276/sjh.v4i2.253.
[7] T. Akbar and A. Falah, “Analisis Pidana Kerja Sosial Sebagai Alternatif Pidana Jangka Pendek : Perspektif KUHP Baru Indonesia,” vol. 3, 2025.
[8] M. Andry Wikra Wardhana Mamonto, “Formulation of Cultural Values Internalization Policy by Regional Government: Efforts to Mitigate the Negative Impact of Globalization on Children”, doi: 10.38035/jlph.v3i4.
[9] Mubarok Nafi, “SOSIO YUSTISIA: Jurnal Hukum dan Perubahan Sosial SISTEM PEMERINTAHAN DI NEGARA-NEGARA RUMPUN MELAYU,” vol. 1, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=b30e29e4014e0b8dfbc6a73a31e5e5f21dee3fabd45ae1debeba88b79f192772JmltdHM9MTc0MjA4MzIwMA&ptn=3&ver=2&hsh=4&fclid=08d2f883-c725-6071-1353-ede9c67361f4&psq=SISTEM+PEMERINTAHAN+DI+NEGARA-NEGARA+RUMPUN+MELAYU&u=a1aHR0cDovL3JlcG9za
[10] O. H. Safithri, “Sita Marital (Maritale Beslag) atas Harta Bersama dalam Perkawinan dalam Hal Terjadi Perceraian”.
[11] D. J. A. Hehanussa et al., METODE PENELITIAN HUKUM. CV WIDINA MEDIA UTAMA, 2023.
[12] D. Anindya, H. Stie, and M. Riau, “PERBANDINGAN PEMBAGIAN HARTA BERSAMA MENURUT HUKUM POSITIF DAN HUKUM ISLAM,” J. Gagasan Huk., vol. 03, no. 02, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://journal.unilak.ac.id/index.php/gh/
[13] Fitra Dewi Nasution Ferry Aries Suranta, “PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERDATA DENGAN MEDIASI MENURUT PERATURANMAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2008,” Mercatoria, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 35–46, Jan. 2012.
[14] A. Pratiwi, B. Santoso, P. Studi, and M. Kenotariatan, “Arti Penting Pengaturan Franchise Dalam Sistem Tata Hukum Perdata Indonesia,” NOTARIUS, vol. 16, 2023.
[15] D. Nur Azra, F. Annisa Qutrunnadaa, Y. Simamora, R. Dio Wijatmika, F. Siswajayanthy, and U. Pakuan Bogor, “Lisensi: Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY SA 4.0) 65 Perkembangan dan Pembaharuan Terhadap Hukum Perdata di Indonesia Beserta Permasalahan Eksekusi dan Mediasi.” [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.yayasanpendidikandzurriyatulquran.id/index.php/AlZayn
[16] A. Aswari, “Peran Ganda Administrator sebagai Mediator dalam Sengketa Transaksi Ponsel Bekas secara Online,” J. Ilm. Kebijak. Huk., vol. 12, no. 3, p. 259, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.30641/kebijakan.2018.v12.259-274.
[17] H. Hasbi, “Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan Melalui Proses Mediasi di Badan Pertanahan Kota Makassar,” PLENO JURE, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 36–46, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.37541/plenojure.v9i1.299.
[18] M. Mangowal, “ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP METERAI ELEKTRONIK DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 10 TAHUN 2020 1 Oleh: Feiti Veronika Kalesaran 2 Fritje Rumimpunu 3.” [Online]. Available: https://aptika.kominfo.go.id/2020/01/revolusi-industri-4-0/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Annisa Ayu Pratiwi, Inda Sari Palinrungi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
