Interpreting Non-Derogable Rights in Indonesia’s Human Rights Protection Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56087/hks1ev09Keywords:
Rights, Human, ConstitutionAbstract
Human rights constitute one of the fundamental foundations of the rule of law, placing the protection of fundamental rights as an essential element in the administration of the state. Within the human rights protection framework, certain rights possess a special character because they may not be diminished under any circumstances. The problem arises when the protection of such rights intersects with the state's authority to impose limitations on human rights, particularly under circumstances that may justify restrictions or derogation. This situation raises questions concerning the scope of protection afforded to non-derogable rights and the relationship between the principle of non-derogable rights and the state's authority to limit human rights. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. This study argues that non-derogable rights must be recognized as a category of rights receiving special constitutional protection and, therefore, cannot be subjected to reduction through general limitation powers. The findings demonstrate that a clear distinction between limitation and derogation is essential in determining the scope of protection afforded to non-derogable rights. This distinction further affirms that the state's authority to restrict human rights remains subject to legal boundaries and cannot be exercised to diminish rights that are fundamentally non-derogable.
References
[1] K. Hadji, H. Ramadhani, M. Ilham, and B. Ahsanul, “Status Hukum dan Perlindungan Ahli Waris Pada Peralihan Tanah Warisan Tanpa Prosedur Sah,” pp. 7128–7137, 2026.
[2] A. Adelia et al., “Keabsahan perjanjian jual beli tanah dari objek tanah warisan yang belum dibagi berdasarkan kuhperdata,” vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 691–698, 2023.
[3] I. G. Ngurah, D. Laksana, F. Hukum, and U. Udayana, “TANAH PERSETUJUAN AHLI WARIS,” vol. 13, no. 10.
[4] A. R. Sinaga and U. S. Utara, “PERSETUJUAN SELURUH AHLI WARIS,” vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 162–172, 2022.
[5] C. Chaterina and B. Djaja, “Akibat Hukum Terhadap Warisan Yang dialihkan Tanpa Persetujuan Ahli Waris ( Studi Putusan Nomor : 107 / PDT . G / 2019 / PN . PLK ),” vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 10736–10743, 2024.
[6] J. Jurnal et al., “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Ahli Waris Terhadap Harta Warisan Yang Beralih Tanpa Persetujuan Ahli Waris Setio Prabowo Cicilia Julyani Tondy,” vol. 1, no. 3, 2023.
[7] D. J. A. Hehanussa et al., METODE PENELITIAN HUKUM. CV WIDINA MEDIA UTAMA, 2023.
[8] Khairul Imam Amran, “KAJIAN HUKUM KEKUATAN PERSETUJUAN ANAK ATAS PERJANJIAN JUAL BELI TANAH WARIS YANG DILAKUKAN IBU,” J. NOTARIUS Progr. Stud. Kenotariatan Pascasarj. UMSU, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 22–37, 2025.
[9] F. A. Parhusip, “Akibat Hukum Jual Beli Tanah Warisan Tanpa Persetujuan Ahli Waris,” vol. 2, no. 1, 2024.
[10] N. Suciati, A. Syarif, and A. Dewi, “Perlindungan Hak Legitieme portie Ahli Waris atas Hibah Pewaris yang Menyebabkan Pembagian Waris Tidak Merata Menurut KUH Perdata,” vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 132–153, 2026.
[11] F. S. Marniati and R. Lontoh, “Batasan Kebebasan Berwasiat : Analisis Legitieme Portie dalam Hukum Perdata Indonesia,” vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 343–371, 2025.
[12] Fatma Faisal, “EKSISTENSI PENGADILAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA TERHADAP PENEGAKAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN,” Gorontalo Law Rev., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 33–48, 2019.
[13] B. Sebagai, N. O. N. Derogable, R. Dalam, and P. Konstitusi, “HAK ATAS KEBEBASAN BERAGAMA SEBAGAI NON DEROGABLE RIGHTS,” no. 1948, 2025.
[14] S. I. U. Fatma Faisal, “Tanggung Jawab Negara Terhadap Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 26 Tahun 2000,” Nomos J. Penelit. Ilmu Huk., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 601–609, 2025.
[15] D. Simanjutak, A. Z. Widjanarka, D. Fajriyatdinansyah, and K. Nurra, “Desentralisasi dalam Negara Kesatuan : Implikasi terhadap Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah di Indonesia,” vol. 2, no. 2, 2026.
[16] R. F. Pertiwi, “Tantangan Hukum Dalam Pelaksanaan Otonomi Daerah Di Era Digital,” vol. 1, pp. 402–405, 2025.
[17] T. Hukum and T. Negara, “OTONOMI DAERAH SEBAGAI INSTRUMEN DEMOKRATISASI LOKAL TINJAUAN HUKUM TATA NEGARA,” vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 324–334, 2025, doi: 10.59971/jamapedik.v2i3.420.
[18] F. Hukum, U. Sam, and R. Manado, “PROBLEMATIKA PERATURAN DAERAH ANTARA TANTANGAN DAN PELUANG BERINVESTASI DI ERA OTONOMI DAERAH,” vol. XVIII, no. 1, pp. 104–122, 2010.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fatma Faisal, Muslimah Muslimah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
