Agreements Contracts in Indonesia : Application of the Consensualism

Zhanya  Zalshabila; Syamsul  Alam; Muhammad Ya’rif  Arifin

Zhanya Zalshabila Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Indonesia
Syamsul Alam Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Indonesia
Muhammad Ya’rif Arifin Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Indonesia

Keywords: Contract, Business, Agreement, Consensus, Law Principal

Abstract

This study aims to determine and analyze the form of application of the principle of consensualism in contract agreements made by the parties and to determine what are the impacts of the application of the principle of consensualism on the protection of the rights of the parties in the agreement. This study uses a normative research method. This study uses a normative legal method that focuses on the analysis of legal norms in laws and regulations, doctrines, and court decisions. The results of this study indicate that the application of the principle of consensualism is a fundamental principle in contract law which emphasizes that an agreement is considered valid and binding on the parties since the agreement is reached. The application of the principle of consensualism also has an impact on providing space for the parties to draft agreements according to their needs, but it can also pose a risk of injustice, especially for parties who have a weak bargaining position. Therefore, effective legal protection, contract supervision, and legal education for the community are important to overcome the negative impacts of the application of the principle of consensualism. The recommendation of this study is To protect the rights of the parties in the agreement, stricter supervision of contract practices is needed, especially in situations where one party has a weaker bargaining position. The government and related institutions are advised to strengthen regulations governing minimum standards for certain agreements.

References

N. A. Sinaga, “PERANAN ASAS-ASAS HUKUM PERJANJIAN DALAM MEWUJUDKAN TUJUAN PERJANJIAN,” 2018.

M. M. F. ramadhan. Andi Muhammad Fikri, “Law Enforcement in Child Fighting Crimes That Result in Death,” Jurnal Hukum: HorizonPublicLegal Studies, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–30, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.15294/panjar.v4i1.55017.

N. I. Wahab, S. Nawi, and D. S. Busthami, “Penuntutan Pengembalian Mahar Akibat Perceraian: Studi Putusan No.517/Pdt.G/2015/Pa.Mrs,” Journal of Lex Generalis (JLS), vol. 2, no. 2, 2021.

Salmawati Salmawati, “EKSISTENSI TANAH WAKAF DALAM PEMANFAATANNYA,” Jurnal Cendekia Hukum, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 153–165, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.3376/jch.v4i2.106.

S. Ulfah, “The Absolute Responsibility Principle in Environmental Environment System,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Institute of Physics Publishing, Jul. 2018. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/175/1/012036.

A. Aswari, “Peran Ganda Administrator sebagai Mediator dalam Sengketa Transaksi Ponsel Bekas secara Online,” Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 259, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.30641/kebijakan.2018.v12.259-274.

A. Pratiwi, B. Santoso, P. Studi, and M. Kenotariatan, “Arti Penting Pengaturan Franchise Dalam Sistem Tata Hukum Perdata Indonesia,” NOTARIUS, vol. 16, 2023.

M. Arsy and A. P. Buana, “Tanggung Jawab Pengembang Terhadap Kualitas Bangunan Yang Telah Terjual di Kota Makassar,” PLENO JURE, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–8, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.37541/plenojure.v10i1.528.

Dhira Utari Umar, “PENERAPAN ASAS KONSENSUALISME DALAM PERJANJIAN JUAL BELI MENURUT PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERDATA,” Lex Privatum, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 38–48, Mar. 2020.