Function Intelligence The District Attorney's Office in Revealing Action Criminal Corruption
Abstrak
This study aims to analyze the role and function of the Pinrang District Prosecutor's Intelligence in disclosing criminal acts of corruption and identifying the obstacles faced in this process. The approach used is an empirical approach with data collection methods through interviews and literature study. Interviews were conducted with the Head of the Intelligence Section, members of the Intel Prosecutor, as well as practicing legal advocates who have in-depth knowledge and understanding regarding the disclosure of criminal acts of corruption and the legal processes that apply in Indonesia. The literature study was carried out by studying relevant laws and regulations as well as other scientific works that discuss the role of the District Attorney's intelligence in disclosing criminal acts of corruption. The research results show that the disclosure process begins with public reports or internal findings received and continues with data collection and exposure involving the Head of the District Attorney's Office, Head of the Intelligence Section, and Head of the Special Crimes Section to determine the feasibility of the investigation. Obstacles faced include limited budget, facilities, and external pressure from certain parties. Therefore, it is necessary to increase the budget and supporting facilities as well as protection for investigators so that the law enforcement process runs optimally. To increase the effectiveness of disclosing corruption cases, it is recommended that there be an additional budget, facilitation of a team of experts, better coordination between institutions, as well as increased transparency and education for the public. The prosecutor's office is also expected to increase the training and capacity of officers to overcome challenges in disclosing criminal acts of corruption in accordance with applicable legal procedures.
Referensi
M. F. Ramadhan, “Legal Review of Action Criminal Exploitation of Street Children at Crossroads in the Name of Beggars,” vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–7, 2025.
M. F. Ramadhan, A. Asis, and A. M. Muin, “Law Enforcement Of The Crime Of Illegal Fishing In The Waters Area Of Pangkajene Regency And The Islands,” vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1904–1909, 2022, doi: 10.35335/legal.
H. M. Supardi, H. Thalib, & Azwad, and R. Hambali, “Perlindungan hukum terhadap penyidikan anak yang menjadi korban tindak pidana pelecehan seksual,” J. Lex Gen., vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 1716–1731, 2021.
A. Jayadi, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Saksi,” El-Iqthisadi J. Huk. Ekon. Syariah Fak. Syariah dan Huk., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 130, 2020, doi: 10.24252/el-iqthisadi.v2i1.14236.
L. M. Hambali Thalib, “Efektivitas Penyidikan Terhadap Penjualan Kosmetik Ilegal,” ournal Lex Gen. ( JLS ), vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1410–1424, 2021.
P. I. Rahadjie, M. Hafidz, and A. P. Buana, “Journal of Lex Generalis ( JLS ),” J. Lex Gen., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 404–417, 2022.
A. R. Hardianto Djanggih, Hambali Thalib, “The Corruption Investigation In The Regional Police of Riau Islands, Indonesia Penyidikan,” Indones. J. Law Econ. Rev., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 6–14, 2022.
A. Nur, H. Thalib, and M. Rinaldy Bima, “Penerapan Asas Legalitas Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika Berdasarkan Ketentuan Minimum Khusus,” J. Lex Gen. (JLS, vol. vol 2, no. 7, p. hlm 10., 2021.
I. A. Wijaya and H. Purwadi, “Pemberian Restitusi Sebagai Perlindungan Hukum Korban Tindak Pidana,” J. Huk. dan Pembang. Ekon., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 93–111, 2018, doi: 10.20961/hpe.v6i2.17728.
Y. Kartika and A. Najemi, “Kebijakan Hukum Perbuatan Pelecehan Seksual (Catcalling) dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana,” PAMPAS J. Crim. Law, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–21, 2021, doi: 10.22437/pampas.v1i2.9114.
F. S. R. Nurul Qamar, Metode Penelitian Hukum: Doktrinal dan Non-Doktrinal, vol. 11, no. 1. 2020.
N. Qamar et al., “Metode Penelitian Hukum (Legal Research Methods),” no. December, p. 176, 2017.
A. Kep, D. Penguatan, R. Kemenristekdikti, U. Nomor, T. Tentang, and M. Uang, “De Jure De Jure,” J. Penelit. Huk., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 339–348, 2019.
L. Yumna and A. Taufik, Sosiologi, Hukum, Sosiologi Hukum. 2023.
FARAHDIBA FITRIANI BACHTIAR, “TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PERKARA PERCERAIAN DIKALANGAN PEGAWAI NEGERI SIPIL (Studi Kasus Pengadilan Agama Karanganyar dan Surakarta),” Nucleic Acids Res., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2018, [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2016.09.008%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00412-015-0543-8%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08473%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2009.01.007%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2012.10.008%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s4159
Suparyanto dan Rosad (2015, “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP SAKSI PELAKU YANG BEKERJASAMA DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Jacob,” Suparyanto dan Rosad (2015, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 248–253, 2020.
S. Rasul, “Penerapan Good Governance di Indonesia dalam Upaya Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” Mimb. Huk. - Fak. Huk. Univ. Gadjah Mada, vol. 21, no. 3, p. 538, 2012, doi: 10.22146/jmh.16276.
B. Wicaksono, A. Agis, and N. Qamar, “Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Pengelolaan Keuangan Dana Desa,” J. Lex Gen., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–5, 2021.
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by-sa4.footer##
